Adler Pulls CodeNEXT! BUT, majority still throws down.

Adler Pulls CodeNEXT! BUT, majority still throws down.

Yes, finally Mayor Steve Adler pulls CodeNEXT. it’s great BUT, media coverage today indicates that Austin voters and neighborhoods will have the unify the city. Because the Mayor’s majority is still throwing down. Watch these clips and tell us we’re wrong. We’ll try to show these tonight at the pub too.

Come celebrate tonight — 6:30 to 8:30 pm at The Local Post Pub, 7113 Burnet. (Program starts at 7:15). Facebook Event page here.

Watch these two short clips!!!

We taped this KEYE-TV interview with Bill Bunch yesterday. Remember, Save Our Springs was a supporter of the petition drive on CodeNEXT. Bill was one of the attorneys who won our court battle. Bill explains how Austin can now move forward as a community. Then, watch the next clip — with Adler majority still at war — especially District 6 Jimmy Flannigan.)

Adler pulls CodeNEXT

Bill Bunch of SOS explains how Austin can now finally move forward together to deal with changes to the land development code — do it incrementally and respect Austin!

In this clip from KXAN-TV at 1:27 note District 6, Jimmy Flannigan, make an outlandish claim that Austinites never wanted to do anything at all for 30 years on transportation and development solutions. Uh, how about decades of attempts to get the Council to do help Austin’s growth pay for itself, Jimmy? (Just some of this work is parked here.)

Austin pals, rich, middle and poor, come on over tonight to get one of these $100 Adler bills. We have lots more work to do now that we’ve got momentum. Sucker Stadium next, then November!

(PS If you can’t make it tonight, sign in to volunteer and/or send a donation to IndyAustin, PO Box 41479, Austin, TX 78704 or donate online here.)

Court Orders CodeNEXT on the ballot; Austin Voters Still the Boss!

Court Orders CodeNEXT on the ballot; Austin Voters Still the Boss!

Court orders CodeNEXT on the ballot! Read the Court Order here.

Travis County District Judge Orlinda Naranjo just ruled that the citizens petition measure to secure your right to vote on CodeNEXT, or any comprehensive land development revisions, be placed on the November ballot. That’s right. And you’re going to have to vote YES on this measure in November.

This Statesman article begins with this extraordinary sentence:

“CodeNEXT will appear on November’s ballot and likely pour kerosene on Austin City Council elections this year just just as campaign season begins to ramp up.” 

Court Orders CodeNEXT on the Ballot, Austin Voters Still the Boss

Please ask yourself now how the heck three attorneys on the city council (Steve Adler, Ann Kitchen and Delia Garza) couldn’t understand this very basic legal point made and accepted by the court. The Judge explains this so clearly in her ruling we suggest you just read it.

Instead, petitioners had to seek relief in court. Therefore, we are all very thankful that the court orders CodeNEXT on the ballot. And, please do not forget that the Texas Constitution and the City Charter of the City of Austin guarantees you your petition rights.

Now, despite what the Statesman has to say, whether Mayor Steve Adler or Ann Kitchen get reelected (Garza was already elected for her second and last term), is totally up to the voters. And, whether you will have good choices in all Council races up in November is a very serious question.

You stood up and got the job done on the petition drive. What’s your next step?

We will help you figure that out! Just send us a note or call us 512-535-0989, especially if you want to come to a meeting. Or fill out our volunteer section here.

It Should Not Go Without Saying

We all owe a debt of gratitude to attorneys Fred Lewis, Bill Bunch and in the background of the Statesman picture is Bobby Levinsky. Then there were scores of activists and neighborhood people who carried the petition, our donors, and the 31,000 people who signed for something very simple.

As Fred Lewis put it at the hearing:

“This isn’t about CodeNEXT. It’s about democracy.”
Petitioners Filed Suit for Your Right to vote on CodeNEXT

Petitioners Filed Suit for Your Right to vote on CodeNEXT

Petitioners filed suit yesterday seeking a Writ of Mandamus.

Representing us all, petitioners filed suit seeking a court to order the City of Austin to put the petition for your right to vote on CodeNEXT on the November ballot. This request for a Writ of Mandamus is very clear. It reiterates what we have told you all along. That is that the Council is obligated to put the measure on the ballot, without judgement.

Pay attention to these two words — “ministerial duty,” defined in Webster’s Legal Dictionary as:

A ministerial act or duty is a function performed without the use of judgment by the person performing the act or duty.

Read it here, it’s only 6 pages — Petitioners Filed Suit for Writ Mandamus.

Now, IF the Council were to use their judgement on placing the petition on the ballot, they could have done so on their first vote. But the majority chose not to. And, at today’s final hearing on CodeNEXT, the Council members who are really listening can plainly see what’s going on. Austinites are very divided on CodeNEXT and likely mostly opposed to it. Is this why the majority has a listening problem?

Here is the list of speakers at today’s hearing. See the line up?

Against: 136
For: 69
Neutral: 26
Total Citizens: 231

You can watch it here LIVE or if you miss it, go to the Archives.

Petitioners filed suit yesterday seeking an expedited case in Travis County District Court. And the petition signers Nelson Linder, Susana Almanza, Jane Rivera, Gilbert Rivera, Michael Hebert, Jeff Jack, Mary Ingle, and D. Lauren Ross, Ph.D., put their names forward to represent us all. This most importantly includes the nearly 26,000 verified voters who signed as certified by the Austin City Clerk on April 23.

We all owe many thanks to attorneys Fred Lewis and Bill Bunch (of Save Our Springs Alliance) for their efforts. Moreover, we appreciate how fast y’all moved!

Petitioners filed suit to defend democracy that we wrote here about last week.

Please volunteer with us by filling this out or just call us at 512.535.0989. Thank you all!

In the wee hours more impervious cover!

In the wee hours more impervious cover!

In the wee hours of the morning at 2 am the so-called “10-1 Council” majority brought new meaning to the term impervious cover.

Action Request: Given that 6 out of 10 Council members voted down the first of their 3 options for your right to vote on CodeNEXT, please take these two steps:

After you read this message, please contact the Mayor and appropriate Council member to either thank them or put them on notice.

Get out to the hearing tomorrow on CodeNEXT.

Mayor Adler and Council Members Kitchen, Casar, Flannigan, Renteria and Garza — voted to close the door on 1 of 3 steps the Council can take to do ensure Austin voters’ right to vote on CodeNEXT. That’s right. It ain’t over yet.

Four courageous Council members – Leslie Pool, Ora Houston, Allison Alter and Mayor Pro-Tem Kathie Tovo, stood truth to power. They voted to simply adopt the ordinance put forth in the CodeNEXT petition and give the voters a waiting period to review and then vote on whatever the Council passes on CodeNEXT (Read the petition here). Ellen Troxclair, having just had a baby, was unable to be present.

Mind you, standing up to this was not easy, given that City Legal brought in their outside attorney Robert Heath. The Mayor gave Heath early speaking privileges at 7:50 pm. Seen here – scroll down to Item 90 Part 1. The rest of us petitioners had to sit and wait until 2 am.

But who really took the cake was Councilmember Ann Kitchen. Kitchen, if you remember, led the battle to counter 10-1 with another plan that eliminated the first independent citizens redistricting commission in Texas. She lost that one. In this case, Kitchen boldly claimed that the CodeNEXT petition is “illegal,” so much as accusing her four colleagues that they were voting for an illegal petition. Thankfully, Councilmember Allison Alter diplomatically called Kitchen on it.

Note: It is not widely known that Kitchen is conflicted out on leading the charge against your right to vote on CodeNEXT. Her husband, Mark Yznaga, was a paid consultant on CodeNEXT. Yznaga showed up a little before 2 am to watch all of this.

Now for impervious cover in the wee hours

CodeNEXT petition is legal, says Bill Bunch of SOS

Bill Bunch of Save Our Springs in the wee hours speaks truth to power on the right to vote on CodeNEXT petition

Watch the 2 am testimony and pay close attention to Bill Bunch of Save Our Springs Alliance — scroll down to Item 90 Part 2 – scr. Bill points out that the same stonewalling by the City Council back in 1992 when the Council failed to keep the SOS initiative off the ballot. Bunch points out that Kitchen was there — on the side of the petitioners! Bunch also points out that calling it “illegal” to keep it off the ballot is not an option. The courts can only act when a petition is actually passed.

The Council’s Only Legal Options

The Council has to place one of these two options on the ballot: 1) the measure we petitioned for – our actual petition language, or 2) our petition language alongside the Council’s own counter proposal. Remember, the Council did that on 10-1. Austin voters passed 10-1, not the Council’s version.

Are you aware that three of the Council members who voted last night to “dis” as in disembowel your petition rights, Adler, Kitchen and Renteria are up for reelection in November? Though IndyAustin cannot, as a specific purpose PAC, tell you who to vote for we can encourage good people to step up and run.

There is plenty of time, by the way. The filing period for candidates to run for Mayor and Council in November starts on Monday, July 23, 2018. The last day a candidate may file is Monday, August 20, 2018 at 5 p.m.

Meanwhile, we will likely witness some on the Council continue digging a grave in the wee hours for your small “d” democratic right to vote. Geographic representation via “10-1” was just the beginning and not a panacea. Voters are going to have to keep stepping up to take back their town. The right to vote on CodeNEXT is your next opportunity.

Cease and Desist Warning to City of Austin

Cease and Desist Warning to City of Austin

We have just issued a Cease and Desist Warning to the Mayor, City Council, City Attorney and City Manager for interfering with the rights of citizens to petition on public property last Saturday – the Austin Public Library. The letter is signed by our attorney, Bill Aleshire, and two additional highly qualified attorneys, Fred Lewis and Bill Bunch.

We strongly feel that the city is now in violation of your constitutional right to voter initiative that is in the city charter itself! This initiative is for the right to vote on CodeNEXT.

Read the Cease and Desist Letter

On Saturday, petitioners collecting signatures for your right to vote on CodeNEXT were forced to leave library property or be cited for trespassing.

The library staffers are not to blame. The directive came from higher ups in the Austin Library System.

This Austin Public Library Memo to stop petitioners even mentions CodeNEXT but why?

What does the content of the petition have to do with this, if petitioning itself is a barred activity?

But don’t get mad, Austin – get even. The only productive way to do that is to help us complete this petition drive.

If everyone receiving this message gets just a few signatures, we will swamp the city with petitions when we file in mid to late March.

Join us at these Early Voting Polls starting tomorrow!

Early Voting Polls: Tues. Feb 20 thru Friday, March 2

But try to reach us first at 512-657-2089 or send a message to

(Please Note: You must remain outside the 100 foot markers at the polls, be polite and, in no way, interfere with voters. Therefore, we want you to ask them to sign on the way out of the voting poll.)

Our CodeNEXT petition page is here.

We can do this, Austin. That’s how we did 10-1 in 2014 and we’ll do it again with CodeNEXT in 2018!